OF SRI HAMSA- YOGI
( Text with English Translation )
Edited and Published by
THE SUDDHA DHARMA OFFICE,
PUBLISHER'S NOTE
AUM. In this, the English Number in the list of Suddha-Dharma Tracts, this treatise on Raja-Yoga by Sri. Hamsa-Yogi is introduced to the Public. To say that this is the first time in the annals of the history of this land that a true and well-organised method on Raja-Yoga is publicly available, is not with a view to make
any claim of any sort what so ever. but just a piece of information quite necessary, in
view of incorrect opinions held on that subject.
This discourse on Raja-Yoga forms part of the superb teachings by Sri Hamsa-Yogi on sanatana Dharma or the Eternal law of individual and cosmic emanation, evolutionary existence, and ultimate convergence, with a knowledge of its secret, this land of Aryavarta had been concerning itself from the long ago. Sri Hamsa-
Yogi's teachings are based on , even as he humbly admits, from what he heard from the
Ishwara of the solar system, Bhagavan Sri Narayana,believed to be abiding in his own
body madeup of particles of what is known as Devi-Prakriti, in the regions of Badri in
the Himalayas, the one supreme teacher,the Adhishthata of the divine
hierarchy--
Suddha- Dharma- Mandalam. This Hierarchy was organised by him, for the sole purpose of governing the innumerable worlds and the world process with a view to guide them towords a higher evolutionary advancement . In the Gita, by Sri krishna, the Avatar of Bhagavan Sri Narayana, mention about the hierarchy is made in the sloka-- " Maharshyaha sapta poorve etc " as the students of gita know so well. Detailed knowledge of this great hierarchy can be had from the published suddha -
literature and from the articles that periodically appeared in the journal "The suddha-
Dharma.
Only a fragment of these teachings was commenced to be published by the mandalam, so early as 1916 under the distinguished leadership of the late revered
Swami Subrahmanyananda (Dr. Sir. S.Subramanier) in conjunction with the late pandit K.T.Sreenivasacharya, Editor " Suddha Dharma Mandala Series ", which, in itself, constitutes a mine of information on the great subject of " Brahmopasana " as it was followed in this land from time immemorial by the ancients, and not available in the extant spiritual literature of this country. Many are at to be published. Want of space prevents us from even a short dilation here on the profound exquisiteness and opportune purposiveness of every one of these publications, well-known as " Suddha-
Dharma Mandala Series ".
It is in the Sanatana Dharma Deepika Vol.II published in the year 1921, that this discourse on Raja-Yoga appears and totals to 118 slokas only, and of which ,
19 slokas are questions put by the enquiring sages, the rest being the reply thereto by Sri Hamsa-Yogi. A translation in english of the Sanatana Dharma Deepika Vol.II was made by the late Sri R. Krishnaswamy Row, Secretary, to the Givernment of Travancore and this appeared periodically in " The Suddha Dharma ". So much of this translation relevent to the present subject matter, is now published with such modifications that seemed necessary. The translation is not one of word for word completely, but a readable English rendering of the difficult subject in a manner that
could be easily grasped and understood.
The appendices at the end constitute an important and integral future of the subject. that which on ' Pranayama' and 'Dhyana' in sanskrit are by Sri Hamsa-Yogi himself, which are found in other places of his teachings. They are also translated in English and added on.The other English versions on Raja-Yoga and Topics from Yoga
Deepika (S.D.M. Publication No.2) are respectively by Sri. R. Krishnaswamy Row and
Sri. R. Vasudeva Row, President S.D.M. Association and these had already appeared
periodically in " The Suddha Dharma ". Apart from the utter necessity of a study of Sri.
Bhagavad Gita published by the Mandalam, now also available with its English translation, and which would give an insight into the subject in the light of suddha teachings, much helpful information can be had also from " The introduction to the study of Sri Bhagavad Gita by Sri. R. Vasudeva Row, which also appeared periodically in " The suddha Dharma " , and now available in book-from and in the booklet " Four essays on Suddha Yoga " by Janardana.
It may be pointed out in this connection, even now,that the English article by Sri R.Krishnaswamy Row refers to the technical mode of practice imparted to the initiated disciples. The fundamental principle of Suddha-Tatwa is that all, irrespective of their age, caste,colour, sex and so on are entitled to these initiations, provided that, they become so desirous and are known to possess certain virtuous qualities. To such of those that are genuine, initiations are made by the Great Elders, in their own way, time and place being no barriers, to them. A Knowledge of the Suddha-method of approach to the subject of Brahmopasana, in terms of the three mahavakyas-- " Sarvam
1.PATANJALI-YOGA
That Patanjali-Yoga passes current as Raja-Yoga is well-known. How this Yoga came to be named so is a mystery. Sage Patanjali defines his Yoga "chittavritti niroda"-- supression of mental modifications. the question, whether the supression of mental modifications, is not a kind of Yogic practice, does not arise, for , Sri Hamsa-Yogi agrees that this practice is 'dharmic', and that this method is one of the many steps, as it were, to Raja-Yoga practice, but not at all necessary. However,according to the strict connotation of the word 'Yoga' coming as it does from the root 'YUj' meaning 'to join' which is positive act, the definition by the sage patanjali will be seen to the negative in its scope--"niroda", no matter to what goal the practice takes one, at the end. So that the definition itself becomes questionable on this basis. Granting, however, that the definition of Yoga by the sage Patanjali should be taken to mean as it is defined by him, since the goal, Which he aims at for the practice he has adumbrated, is supposed to
satisfy the definition, the question should still arise, whether, this goal would any where warrant the whole practice being denominated Raja-Yoga. We have examine this point on the existing scriptural basis.
The Upanishad-Dictum runs thus--' Atma Sarvesham Raja'-- Atma is the king of all, as it is sufficiently well-known. That Atma is 'Gnanavigraha'-- Idol of knowledge, 'sakshi'--Witness, 'cheta'-- All-concious, 'kevala'--Untained and free, 'Nirguna'--non qualitative, 'Angushthavigraha'-- of the size of thumb in the heart, 'Antaryami'-- All-pervasive, is also not a new truth, to be disputed. So then, Raja-Yoga should mean that act of joining or contacting the Atman as a positive act. On this basis we have to findout whether the goal chalked out by the Sage Patanjali for his Yoga has any semblance to that which the Upanishads lead us to conclude.
The goal visualised by Patanjali is embodied in the 34th sootra of adhyaya IV of his 'Yoga-Sootras' (Panini Office Publication) and runs thus: Purusharthasoonyanam gunanam pratiprasavaha kaivalyam swaroopapratishtha va chitashaktiriti. The meaning of this sootra in the most simple language may be said to be this: ' The contrary effect or result of the obsence of desire of the purusha, (which desire is) due to qualities, is kaivalyam, Swaroopaprathishtha or chitashakti.
That the quality of satwa has got to be generated by virtue of its
highly purifying nature--'nirmalatvat', illuminating power--'Prakasakam', and free from affictions--'anamayam', is obvious according to Gita ; and though it results in the acquisition of high knowledge --'satwat sanjayate gnanam', it is still binding due to the tendency it creates for attachment to 'sukha'--enjoyment and knowledge associated with it-- sukhasangena badnati gnanasangena dehinam. This is visualised by the Lord in the Gita to take one to a higher realm of happiness 'atyantyasukham or susukham' and 'Moksha' also. Sage Patanjali seems to be satisfied with the lower state of being bound by 'satwa' which is 'kaivalya' to him ; and this is, in other words, "swaroopaprathishtha"-- establishment in one's own nature, supremely content and happy, or 'chitishakti'-- the power of consciousness. Swaroopapratishtha is self explanatory but what is this 'chitishakti'. Sootra 26 of adhyaya IV saya-- "Tada vivekanimnam kaivalyaprakbharam chittam" which means 'The mind yoked to 'kaivalya' attains descrimination'. That is to say, the goal of this practice is the attainment of discrimination ; and of a very powerful kind it must be as between Atma and Anatma which is the discrimination generally advocated. But where is the contavt with Atman here. It may be said that the expression 'swaroopapratishtha' conveys it. This can be agreed to if it is not associated with the bondage created by Satwa, the 'chitishakti' of discrimination ; for, Atman is free from all qualities, even 'satwa'. To contact it, must be the goal of Raja-Yoga according to the meaning of the term 'Raja' on the basis of the Upanishads. It may be, that Patanjali-Yoga ultimately leads to it and so it is Sri Hamsa-Yogi saya that a practice of the sort mentioned is one of the many steps to Raja-Yoga. And yet it should be pointed out that there is no mention of the word 'Atman' at all in this exposition, which is the fundamental requisite of contact for Raja-Yoga.
The next point is whether the Sage Patanjali himself has declared his Yoga, Raja-Yoga, anywhere in his treatise at all. He has not, and as such we can assume no right to deem it so, to satisfy our own yearnings, as it were, by superimposing a name on this Yoga, which the Sage never meant. Itis true, that in the Upanishads we do not get any knowledge of this Raja-Yoga either, although treatment is made about other Yogas viz.--Mantra, Laya and Hatha- the three of the four main Yogas including
this one, expect for the definitions that are found in the
'Yogasikhopanidshad' and 'Yogatatwopanishad' . But these definitions do not help us. The surface meaning of the definition in the 'Yogisikkopanishad' leaves a bad odour, and one feels troubled with the thought, whether the very many grotesque practices one hears, could not but be the results of perverted meanings imported into this definition by the undesirables.As regards the other one in the 'Yogatatwopanished', it cannot betermed a definition, since it spoeaks of the guidance, one practising Raja-Yoga, is said to get.
Then the question arises as to how Patanjali-Yoga came to be named Raja-Yoga. We may not be incorrect if we deduce that the second line of the second sloka in the 'Yogasikkooanishad' (sloka 137 in the book Yogapanishads published by adyar Library) should have acted as inspiration to name Patanjali-Yoga as Raja-Yoga. That line runs thus-- ' animadipadamprapya rajate rajoyagataha' . In the adhyaya on 'siddhi', Sage Patanjali mentions about the devolopment of powers like ' anima' etc. in the 44th sootra. This correspondence ought to have been exploited by naming the one as teh other. The phonetic definition of the word 'Raja' that one generally hears about, may be said to be a latter innovation to justify the stand that was taken as above . To so justify, on the basis that the Upanishads do not help us is an explanation out of court. That the practice of Patanjali-Yoga has a value for those who are so inclined, since it is said to aid and free one from the affictions of Rajasic and Tamasic qualities and to generate satwic qualities may be true. But the devolopment of 'Siddhis' or powers is probably a greater attraction to those that take to it. However, the calamitous results of seeking to develop these powers only, by those without meticulously purifying themselves in the light of the Sage's instructions, need not be visualised here. The Sage insists that these tendencies also are to be suppressed for attaining the Satwic quality with its results. We have no examples of one such amongst us now, to know how he would react to the Rajasic and Tamasic qualities by which human beings are governed helplessly ; and as such, any conclusions thereof must be purely hypothetical. Even so,on the basis of an incomplete knowledge of this Yoga also to evaluate this with the results said to be
achieved by the Western Experimental Psychology is likely tomislead very much both. The aim of this Psychological experimentation under laboratory conditions, seems to be to record the actions and reactions of the qualitative emanations. such emanations are infinite. Since these projections from living entities are unique in each case, varying with each other, due to the million-fold combinations of various degrees,of the prime three qualities of Satwa, Rajas and Tamas, to aim to count or catelogue them is something like the mad act of counting sands on the sea-shore, and will be just as much true as the claim that they are so counted. But of this we are not now concerned.
As regards the direction given in the other-- ' Yogatatwopanished', it may be said, that there is in it an incentive to study Gita, in which the Lord gives his teachings on Raja-Vaidya, a preliminary to the actual practice of Raja-Yoga, to be taught subsequently by the Gnanis avd Tatwadharsis. To what high attainments we could not have reached if we had only taken to a study of this unique scripture on a
mass scale all these years, as it is done now, instead of deluding ourselves and misguiding others about patanjali_Yoga it is useless to speculate now. In so far the mistaken notion about Patanjali-Yoga continues to prevail even now as it could be well seen from the prevalent practices of 'chittavrittiniroda' in North India in the name of Raja-Yoga, and not so much in the South, though it is trying to peep in here also, that these reflections are made, to warn, and not in any other spirit . Sincere aspirants engaged in spiritual and Yogic quest, if they would only bestow some thought in a searching spirit could do a great service, for ,the acquisition of correct knowledge is more important. It is fervently hoped that the teachings of the great 'Gnani' and 'tatwadharsi'---Sri Hamsa-Yogi, rreleased for the benefit of humanity so very generously, would be luckily noticed by such aspirants, not only for their own lead and light but also for rendering service to others as well.
II. YOGA OF THE MAHAT-PLANE WITH MANAS
By way of example of the Yoga which has for its purpose the
contacting of the Mahat-plane with Manas, Vedanta-Karma-Yoga was mentioned as an instance. To understand this, we have to make a short enquiry as to what Vedanta really stands for, notwithstanding the fact of its being well-known in this land of virile Vedanta.
'Vedanaam antaha' is 'Vedantaha', according to the etymological significance of the term. The suffix 'anta' in the term should show that it relates to the terminal aspect of the Vedas. It follows that Vedanta has no place for itself, all-alone, unless it is preceded by a knowledge of Vedas, and a life lived according to them.Though allied to Vedas thus intimately, Vedanta has a distictness, nevertheless, in view of the facts that it treatsabout a stage of life arrived at after it has been lived according to Vedas. What is this life, is a question.
Of the four well-known 'purusharthas' or aims of man influencing the fours stages of his life, Moksha or release is the last 'purushartha' and Vedanta being a treatise thereof is known as 'Moksha-Dharma', treating about the process of release from the helpless transmigatory samsaric life. It shows that the Vedas do not treat about this aspect, confining as they do to atreatment of the first three 'purusharthas' only viz. , Dharma, Kama and Artha, the Dharma herein having reference to Varnashrama method of life and known as 'pravritti-Dharma'. That is to say Vedas speak about the life in evolution ; while the other, the Vedanta, about involution or the cessation from evolution and so it is known as 'Nivritti-Marga'. So it is said that the significance of Vedas--'vedarthaha' has in them the seed of knowledge for the multiplicity of world-processes--bheejebootaha, whereas Vedanta is said to be 'bindulakshana' or the nature of terminus thereof. It is not that the Vedas do not treat about life after death ; they do, but only as far as life in 'Swarga' or mental-heaven is concerned, involving the Jeeva's return to this world again, and hence this path of death and birth is known is 'Dakshinayana' or the southern path or 'Krishna-gati'-- the path of darkness ; while the Vedanta on the other is known as 'Sukla-gati' or the path of light and also ' Uttarayana' or the northern path, which helps overcoming transmigration. It is because the Vedas do not help in this direction, they come under
the condemnation of Gita, the Lord, promulgating Vedanta
therefor--Vedantakrit.
The fundamental basis of enquiry of vedanta is that of 'Brahm--Brahmavichara' as being the All-Cause-- 'sayvakaranam'. Since casual determiners are known as Sankhyas. 'Sankhyaha karana vignaninaha' Vedantins are called Sankhyas. Their conclusion was, that the transmigrating Jiva or Jivatman of the Vedas is itself the Cause, barring the 'Jivatwa'-- which signifies the tremulous vibration objectified in living beings manifesting the sign of life ; that is to say-- Atman as the cause. Accordingly, Atman came to be identified with Brahm in the Vedanta enquiry. But the knowledge , which the Vedanta furnished in this enquiry was only theoretical to bring conviction in the mind, regarding the All-Cause--Brahm as being one's own Atman, and how it relates itself to objective factors of life. If this theoretical knowledge has been sufficient in itself to attain 'Moksha' , then, there would not have been the famoussruti-dictum-- Vedantavignana sunischitarthaha samnyasa yogaha yatayaha suddhasatwaha, as it is started in the Mundakopanishad.
that sruti demands an endeavour further on to attain Moksha through Samayasa-Yoga not stopping merely with Vedanta-Vichara. That Sannyasa-Yoga means Karma-Yoga is what we also learn from Gita-- Yaha samnyasamiti prahuhu yogam tam viddhi pandava. So that, Vedanta-Vichara has to necessarily terminate with Karma-Yoga to
attain Moksha. This Karma-Yoga, however, is purely of the Nivritti or isolationist type, which repells taking part in any of the objective pursuits of life, and confines itself with one- pointed determination to contact the Atman as an all absorbing pursuit. This is what the ancient samnyasa ashramites of the Varnashrama- order did at a time of well-ordered society on that line. The Karma-Yoga of the Gita does not countenance this isolationist theory, nor does it deem that the realisation of Atman is possible by isolation only, but of this we need not enter into, here, now.
'Atmano Mahato Veda'-- Know the Atman in Mahat, is the dictum. that there is a plane known as 'Mahat' which is higher than Manas and is the seat of Atman, the Cause, the modern Vedanta philosophy, engaged as it merely does with lop-sided enquiry alone, has lost sight of. Mahat means
great. The term is intended to convey the vastness and the infiniteness of the visible cosmos, which is said to be the first outcome of the brahmic ideation 'bahusyam prajayeyeti'-- let Me become many ; and which is the play-ground of the Atman multiplying itself into many. The space-idea connoted by the term Mahat is the material or prakritic or 'anatmic' counterpart, while the Atman connoting time-idea is the other, of the ideating brahm. That the two go together is a scientific fact. The intensity or the atomic condition of prakriti or its extensiveness is by virtue of the Atman behind. The Ancients came to the conclusion, therefore, that to know the nature of this Atman, it is not possible by any outside search, since it is greater than the great-- 'Mahatonaheeyam' ; and though it is smaller than the smallest 'anoraneeyam', it could be contacted through suitable means in oneself. It is in this process of search that various experiences are said to have been got by various people, and also various powers were realised. in this aim
to contact the Atman in the Mahat Plane. Karmatas are deemed to have experienced it as jyoti or Light ; the Bhaktas or devotees have stated that their experience was one of panoramic view or transcendental divine forms ; while the Gnanis experienced this contact either in the 'saguna' forms of the Trimoorties-- Brahma, Vishnu and Siva, or in its nirguna form as 'Angushthavigraha' or of the size of one's own thumb. When the contact of the
Mahat-Plane is complete, one is deemed to have attained the state of 'Kaivalya' or Mahat or Gnanakaivalya as it is called, when the aspirant having transcended the forces of helpless transmigatory existence and thereby 'achieving' ' swatantra' or freedom, is said to take part in the cosmic governance of the worlds. It is stated, however, that the mere touch of the Mahat-Plane with Manas, which means the contacting of the those forms mentioned and also the realisation of saguna and nirguna forms, does not by itself enable one to transcend birth and death ; for, that is got only when Mahat Kaivalya is got ; which means the dawning of the knowledge that Atma is not bound by our ideas of sin and merit etc., and is all-pervasive antaryami. What is known as Manas-Kaivalya is that which generates the realisation of 'vibhooties' and 'KarmaKaivalya' goes by the name of samnyasa. The Kaivalya mentioned in Patanjali-yoga may be
deemed to fall under the category of ManasKaivalya.
Vedanta-Karma-Yoga, which is thus certainly higher than Patanjali-Yoga in its aims has, as could be seen, for its purpose the contacting of the Mahat with Manas, and not got by a mere verbal knowledge of Vedanta, which is all what we seem to have now. Patanja;i-Yoga, when the fascination for the development of powers is counteracted, helps one to get at a powerful discrimination. This is more easily got through the aid of 'Sadhanachathushtaya' , if discrimination alone is what is wanted, to enable one, to gain mastery in Vadantavichara. But it is through Vedanta Katma-Yoga that further progress is got. In those famous thirty two Brahma-Vidyas we get the required knowledge, , but we have lost their touch now, confining ourselves as we do only wtth quarrels in philosophy.
B efore we proceed further we would do well to note another instance of practice in the name of Raja-Yoga, that is recently brought to light. The added interest to consider this is in view of the fact of its purporting to contact Mahat with Manas which we were discussing. This practice is said, to be in vogue in what is known as Esoteric Yogachara School of Tibet. A recent pamphlet "Replenishment from the Centre by a new method of Raja-Yoga" by one Mr.Basil Crump of that School, 89, Lower Circuler road, Culcutta, gives us an idea thereon. He states that Raja-Yoga is practised in this Esoteric School, which is said to be different from the popular one of "Yogachara" well known as one of the main four Buddhist cults ; and that, in this latter School, said to be in charge of the red Lamaists of Tibet, only certain rites with formulas and mantras are observed, and that, the Hatha Yogins and Tantrikas of India are well conversant with it ; while in the former-- the Esoteric School, said to be a very ancient one and the Chiefs thereof are known as Arhats, Raja-Yoga is said to be taught to its members.
Regarding this Practice, Mr.Basil Crump quotes the following in his pamphlet--" According to an important teaching given by its Head in 1889, it is this -- Mahat is the highest entity in the Kosmos beyond there is no
diviner entity. It will not be destroyed, even at the end of Mahamanvantara,when all the gods are absorbed, but will emerge from Parabrahmanic latency. This is because it is evolving through experience like the individual Manas in Man. Alaya is above it as a principle". 'Alaya is said to be what is termed as "AnimaMundi" the soul of the world -- the distinction between Alaya and Mahat is, while the former is a principle, the latter is an entity. Mr.Crump states that the 'divine spark' in man is 'Mind-Manas' , and the 'Higher power' which it emanates is called in sanskrit 'The Great One-- Mahat' which is defined as the first principle of intelligence and consciousness. And latter on he adds , "The great vedantic orator Swami Vivekananda always insisted that Masses should be taught about the Atman, by which he meant, the spark of 'Mahat' in man. The Atman is a universally diffused principle, which overshadows man without entering him. it is not an actual Entity like 'Mahat' which projects its essence(Manas) in Man".
We need not get into an examination of these points here since they would reveal themselves as we proceed. However, it is to be noted that the fascination for Raja-Yoga is such that, here we find an example.It is unnecessary to state that this is not Raja-Yoga on the basis of Sri Hamsa Yogi's teachings.
Hoeever, an important point of philosophical interest arises in this connection by the mention of the expression Para-Brahman in the above, i view of the fact that Buddhism, of which this School belongs, is deemed to be a 'Nastika' Religion. and as such said to be driven out of this land of its birth by Sri Shankara, As to what is meant by 'Nastika ' opinions vary. Some deem it to mean 'Nireeswara'-- non-belief in apersonal God ; some as ' Nirvideeka'--non acceptance of the Vedas which include Upanishads ; while others are said to equate it to mean non- acceptance of the ultimate Para-Brahm, since the Ultimate they pestulated was "soonya"--Nihil. But, herein, the term 'Para-Brahm' is freely brought in. In view of the fact, that at the time of Shankara such a positive termas the ultimate was stated to be 'soonya' which brought the condemnation of this Religion by the Acharya , the question arises whether or not this positing of Para-Brahm in Buddhistic
literature is a latter innovation.Mrs.Rhys Davids, a life-long student of Buddism is said to have come to the conclusion, as a result of her research work of Pali literature, that according to the original teachings by Gautama Buddha this Religion was not 'Nihilistic' and that, the Ultimate was postulated as
" The Absolute or Supreme Being". On this conclusion and also from the actual mention of the word Para-Brahm in the "Esoteric Yogachara School" a new philosophical question arises. the light thrown on this important point by the Suddha School should be illuminating.Here it is.
The Ultimate known as Para-Brahm was also known as 'Athatho adeso neti-neti', according to Brihataranyopanishad. That is to say, the Ultimate has two
aspects-- one, the positive, hailed by the name of Para-Brahm, and the other, the negative, which is Neti-Neti. The followers of the former are deemed to be 'Astikas', those of the latter 'Nastikas'. The 'Nastikas ' are so named because of their non-acceptance of the name Para-Brahm ; that is all and no more. sage Gobhila of the Suddha School of thought in his Karika of Mahabharata saya that the nomenclature 'asti and nasti' that is, 'is and is not' , attributed to the ultimate Brahm is only verbal, because , transcending as it always does above thought and speech--'avangmanasagocharam' , the naming of it in either way does not in any way belittle or enhance the truth of the Buddhists seemed to have done, is said, to be as valid as the scriptual dictum Neti-Neti, even as it is positively termed , Para-Brahm therein. Accordingly, this is what the sage says-- yatasccha nastikyamapi brahmaswa-
The Sage, however, though adoring Gautama Buddha as the very Avatar of Bhagavan Sri Narayana who incarnated to uplift the 'Charvakas' that were tied down to body-consciousness only, still holds out that the four orders of Buddhism Madhyamika, Yogachara, Soutrantika and
Vaibhashika along with the Charvaka School and another , Digambara or Jaina Religion--that is six in all, belong to the category of 'Nastika' only. This explanation is, on the basis of the authority of Bhagavan Sri Narayana, that,of the two fundamental aspects of Para-Brahm, by which alone it could be known , namely, Bhava and Abhava or Atma and Anatma, or Purusha and Prakriti or kshetragna and kshetra, these so called ' Nastikas' are said to have offered their worships to the 'Abhava' asspect of Brahm in the full of faith of its being anaspect of the said Para-Brahm--'abhavaroopam brahmiva astiti samayaha' ; and that such worship was offered to ' prakritabrahmaswaroopam' , that is the prakritic forms of Brahm, explained as 'aksharavibhootimatu' which may be deemed to mean as the power of the spoken word. The Sage adds, that though their dharma is not, either in terms of Brahm as such or its aspects as Atma, but only on the basis of prakriti or A
ja--vina brahma tathatmanam ajameva cha yejanaha jaananti tesham dharma, yet what they declare is pure and true and purificatory-- vachamuttamam satyam suddham pavitram ; and as such should always be respected 'sarvatha manya' . It is needless to state here the amount of profound respect this greatReligion of Buddha still holds on its Votaries and the unequalled moral and ethical discipline formulated therein to overcome the ills incident to this life, as also of higher esoteric truths in their own way.
Sri Shankara's stand against it was because of its deeming the Ultimate as 'soonya' , Although Shankara postulated the Ultimate as Para-Brahm, he equated it only to its Atmic or 'Bhava' aspect thereof, and not to the whole of Para-Brahm, as such, which includes both 'Bhava' and 'Abhava aspects, even while still maintaining
its mysterious state of 'Eternally Unknowable' . This suddha truth is a very important definition of Para-Brahm that should not be lost roight of. The illusion theory of 'Maya' attributed to Jagat or the world by Sri Shankara is a natural corollory of his completely ignoring the 'abhava' aspect and stressing the 'bhava' or atmic aspect alone. In Buddhism, however, 'Maya' is a power of illusion and not illusion itself merely. That is how is , in this School, which confined to the 'abhava' aspect only the development of the power aspect through the intonation of Mantras etc. already spoken of as
'aksharavibhootimatu' gained importance. In the Vedantic Religion of Shsnksrs, the "Vichara" or enquiry aspect alone of the spoken word regarding Atman was developed ; which resulted in the gradual detevioration in the faith of the power of Mantras generally. The latter Schools of Vedanta arose to counteract the unhealthy influence of deeming the world 'mitya' or 'maya' or illusion ; which also refuted the concept of Atman as Nirguna, and stressed the Saguna aspect thereof in the form of VIshnu, though Atman is both Sagunaand Nirguna in relation to the world-process. As was pointed out , Saguna and Nirguna forms are one for experiencing and not for mere philosophical discussions. The Atman is as much Nirguna, as it is Saguna, according to the lord--'atma akasa dehasyat chitroopo vishnuravyayaha' . It is the aspect known as Atman that is important more than saguna and Nirguna.
It may be stated that out of the teachings of the Gita, wherein, the Atmic, and the Prakritic aspects of Brahm, as also the Suddhs-Brahmic state are given, the Buddhist School took to the Prakritic aspect, while the modern Vedanta School, to the Atmic aspect. The mutual influence of these two and also of their transcendence which is 'Suddham' is the yogic state and the knowledge thereof is embodied in Yoga-Dharma or Suddha-Dharma which is the teaching of Gita. So, Gita is not merely a Vedantic exposition as it is usually stated, The Suddhas deem it correctly Yoga- Brahma-Vidya or the Synthetic Science of the Absolute, the actual realisation thereof, being got by the practice of Raja-Yoga taught by Suddha Dharma Mandalam.
III. YOGA OF AVYAKTA-PLANE WITH MANAS
Before we proceed further, it is helpful to bear in mind that for purposes of this Yoga, knowledge in terms of Tatwas is an absolute requisite as stressed inGita. The Tatwas are mainly three in number- 'Prakriti-Tatwa', 'Atma-Tatwa', and 'Brahma-Tatwa'. 'Prakriti-Tatwa' has reference to the matter formations which are four in number, namely, Indriya, Manass, Mahat and Avyakta also called Tatwakootas, which infold in themselves the various worlds. Atma-Tatwa deals with the evolutionary
and involutionary process-- 'Pravritti' and 'Nivritti' of the Atman in those Tatwakootas, the various states of Jagrat(walking), swapna(dreaming), Sushupti (deep- sleep ) and Turiya (the fourth), functioning therein in terms of Gnana, Iccha, Kriya and Yoga, the operating qualitative forces of Satwa, Rajas and Tamas, which bind the Atman therein, with the corresponding release therefrom and the attainment of the state known as 'Brahmee-stiti' . Brahma-Tatwa is about the fundamental five brahmic manifestations known as ' Purusha' , 'Paramartha' , ' Atma' , 'Jivatma' and 'Aksharatma' and the corresponding
sheaths or Kosas, in which they abide deriving the said names, viz. Anandamaya, Vignanamaya, Manomaya, Pranamaya, and Annamaya rrespectively. In the Gita, the contact of the first Brahmic manifestation--Aksharatma is extensively dealt with as an important preliminary, in addition to others.
Now we may resume to familiarise ourselves with Sri Hamsa Yogi's teachings on Raja-Yoga. He says in the sloka 46 ' Avyaktatma turiya syatsamban-
The term 'Avyakta' literally means unmanifest, nondifferentiated, so that there is always present a certain amount of mystery with this name. It is said that it goes by various names in different Schools of Thought such as -- 'Avyakta' by the Tatwawits, 'Moola-Prakriti' by the sankhyas, 'Turiya' by the Vedantins, 'Brihadanda' or the Big Egg by the pouranikas, 'padma' or lotus by the Yogabrahmavidhyadhikaris, 'Aum' by the Kevaladhikaris, 'Kapalam' or skull by the knowers of the five modes of actioning. In the Mahabharata, names such as 'avyakta'(unmanifest), 'prakriti' (matter), 'pradhanam' (primal), 'yoni (birth-place), 'Avyayam' (immutable), 'nityam' (ever-present), 'ekam' (oneness), 'anu' ( atom), 'vyapi' (pervasive), 'kriyaheenam' ( actionless), 'ahetukam' (causeless). 'tamah' (darkness), 'sivam' (bliss), 'dhaama' ( refuge), 'rajaha' ( fiery-activity), 'sanatanam' (eternal), 'nirvikaram' (changeless), 'pralaya' (deluge), 'prabhava' (exteriorising), 'apyaya' (withdrawing), 'anudrikam' (undivided), 'anunam' (whole), 'akampam' (non-tremulous), 'achalam' (unshakeable), 'druvam' ( steadfast), 'shantam' (peaceful), 'Brahma' , 'sat' ( truth), 'asat' (changing truth), 'trigunam' ( triqualitied), 'suddham' (pure), 'satwam' ( bright), 'uttamam' (great), 'tat' ( that), 'ajaram' ( ageless), 'aksharam' (indestructible), 'ksharam' ( subject to decay) , 'pratamam' (first), 'turiyam' ( fourth), and 'agrahyam' (not-graspable) are used some of the terms connoting 'avyakatatatwa' itself, some indicating the nature of the function therein, while others denoting the Atman in that plane. However, that it is the primal origin of the entire world processes-- Mahat, manas, and sense-worlds-is clear from the Gita-dictum--'avyaktat vyaktayaha sarvaha' . As the non-graspable origin, it is
the first or primal. But from our point of view it is the fourth, since we have to grow into it, from Senses to Manas from Manas to Mahat, from Manas to Avyakta, wherein, the Atman resides inseparably. In the Gita this is conveyrd in the sloka, 'indriyani paranyahurindriyebhyaha param manaha manasastu parabuddhiryo buddhe parasa-
stu saha'-- senses are high, higher than Senses is Manas, higher than Manas is Buddhi, higher that Buddhi is He--the Atman in the avyakta plane.
This Avyakta plane called the Yogic-plane by virtue of its eternal indivisibility and Origin is, however, from our point of knowing it in its actual condition, said to be two-fold, the higher and the lower--'uttaramukha and dakshinamukha' and the Atman in the higher plane is termed Paramatma or Yogatma -a state of utter silence--Mouna,( note its experience mentioned latter on) while in the lower plane of Avyakta which is also paramatmic, it is known as 'Gnanatman' , the Cause of the world-processes, also the functioner thereof in terms of directing them--'Prabhu' , and also the experiencer thereof--'Bokta' , Technically, the higher level goes by the name of 'Suddhavyaktam' and the lower 'Asuddhavyaktam' or the seed of the world-processes. Thus the Atman in the latter level, as the Cause, is 'Avyaktatman' also known as Kevala-Paramatman or simply Kevalatman. It may be asked how Avyaktatman could be termed Gnanatman. It is , because, as the origin of the world-process and other functionings in it, 'Gnana' aspect alone has to be dominant, whether for progressing forward with creation-'pravritti-marga or for withdrawing--'nivritti or pralaya' , in absolute independence ; and hence 'Avyakta' is known as 'Gnanam' itself according to Mahabharata-- 'Gnanam avyaktamityuktam' ; while from our point of view, gnana or knowledge is avyakta or mystery and as such requires to be learnt, it is not so to the Atman in that plane or to the aspirant who has reached it.
According to Gita Avyakta is Akshara--'avyaktoksharamityuktam' . There is a Certain amount of technical learning, which, the students of Yoga have to know in respect of this Aksharm, the first manifestation of 'Brahm' , and about which some reference was previously made. It is this.
The ordinary meaning of the term 'Akshara' is indestructible, and this one is apart from its being the primal sound- Aum. And Avyakta is known as Akshara because it is in the plane of the never ceasing activity of creation and convergence 'pravritti and nivritti' or sarga and pralaya--'sargapralaya dharmatwat avyaktam prahuraksharam'. Herein we see that creation and convergence--'sarga and pralaya' is a dharma i.e. a feature of activation which is, as fundamental, as that of its being the seat of Gnana or knowledge, consequent on which the aforesaid activities of
that plane are born. For Gnana and Karma or knowledge and activity always go together , the latter being necessarily the result of former-- 'phalam hi gnanayogasya Karmeti budhyatae' as the Lord puts it, as the rule. Creation and convergence always go together also as an inter-allied activity. That is why all created factors have ever an end. And this end, however, does not stop there , but marks the commencement of an
epoch of another creative activity with corresponding terminus thereof ad infinitum. In between these activities of creation and convergence, 'sthithi' or existence springs up as a necessary factor. This existence, however, may differ from the twinkling of the eye to aeons, the duration of which depends upon the will of the ideating Atman behind. Thus, as aconsequence we have now the time-factor presenting itself, which is said to be Atman verily 'Kilosmi lokakshayakrit' according to Gita-- because 'sthithi' is time-factor under the control of the Atman, and identical with it. Time or Kala has no existence by itself except in association with Space or Loka, which is the material to he worked upon by time during the state of Sthithi. This Space-factor is prakritic and for purposes of world-processes are mainly divided into three, namely, Mahat, Manas and Indriya Groups,already said, which,in addition to Avyakta, the seed of these activities, constitute the main four groups for functioning. In these four groups are comprised the well-known twenty-four tatwas which are technically known as 'Gayatri-Tatwas'. All these twenty-four tatwas catalogued into those four tatwa-kootas are specialised further in Man as the well-known Kosas for functioning therein by the Atman.
In the state of Avyakta , time and Space constitute a simultaniety. It is Yogic. When the ideating Avyaktatman conjoins itself with the creative or forthgoing activity, started by itself--'pravritti' then only, the prakriti or matter condition presents itself and not before-- pravrittimatmano yogat prakriteravadarayat. The activity of the Atman is by virtue of the inherent jivatatwa-- life-force in it, ( about which reference was once made), which makes it to multiply itself from its unitary state into many--'bahusyam prajayeyeti' for its own purpose of enjoying and experiencing the manyness. Prakriti or matter which presents itself in this ideation of Atman, helps in the formation of the distinctive manyness, and the Atman entering into these
matter formations by getting itself split-up, becomes limited by them and thus we have what is known as the 'jivatmic' states, The prime such matter-formation is said to be Atomic. Students of Science, aware of the self-division of the unicellular organism through the process of fission, can easily grasp this multiplication of the one into many-- ekatvena